You’re reading Crypto for Advisors, CoinDesk’s weekly newsletter that unpacks digital assets for financial advisors. Subscribe here to get it every Thursday.
Happy Thursday, advisors!
In today’s newsletter, Eric Soufer of Tusk Strategies looks at what financial firms are building while Congress stalls on a crypto framework.
Then, in “Ask an Expert,” Diego Grassano explains what advisors should check before trusting a tokenized platform.
While Congress stalls, Wall Street sets its own crypto rule
Without a federal framework, financial firms are standardizing compliance and infrastructure on their own.
When the Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act on Sept. 15, the U.S. was once again left without a comprehensive federal framework for digital assets, and regulators moved to fill part of the gap. Two days later, the SEC issued an “innovation exemption” allowing certain venues to trade tokenized U.S.-listed stocks onchain.
But an exemption is not a statute, and it can be narrowed or withdrawn as easily as it was granted. That leaves financial firms with a practical question: What do you build while you wait? For advisors, the answer matters more than who won or lost in Washington.
That question ran through a Crain’s New York Business event last week, whether the topic was tokenization, compliance or cybersecurity. The people closest to the work aren’t waiting for Congress. They’re building for the world as it is.
Adam Schumann, vice president of legal at OKX, laid out the legal problem. U.S. firms answer to federal statutes, federal agencies, state laws and state regulators, and none of them move at the same speed. “You want general consistency, but you’re not going to reach uniformity,” he said. Firms work out the rest state by state and country by country, while agencies patch the most immediate gaps.
That patchwork has a cost. Aravind Raju, CFO of Uphold, said compliance is now one of the company’s largest departments because it builds tailored solutions for each state’s requirements. As rules become clearer and more aligned, he expects those resources can be redirected. For advisors, the takeaway is that compliance is a real cost of doing business on these platforms, and the firms that manage it well will have an edge.
You might expect that duplication to push the industry toward shared infrastructure. Instead, many institutions launched private, closed networks this year for tokenized assets, stablecoins and securities ledgers, and those networks can’t easily talk to one another. Lewis Tuff, CEO of Twilight, which builds clearing and settlement technology, said the result is that every firm ends up rebuilding the same connections.
Risk is moving in the opposite direction, toward separation. Early crypto firms bundled trading, custody and clearing under one roof. Today, traditional custodians hold digital assets, and the venues that execute trades are increasingly separate from the ones that safeguard them. That means no single entity has to hold every key function or become a single point of failure. Compliance and security are shifting too, from annual attestations and periodic reviews to checks that run continuously, with every transaction.
None of this required Congress, and that’s the point. Without a comprehensive framework, the industry is converging on practices any future law would find hard to ignore: verified counterparties, clear lines between trading and custody, and compliance that never stops running.
Whether these practices become a bridge to legislation or a substitute for it is still an open question, but the direction is clear. Raju offered one prediction. Within three years, he said, “we’ll probably stop using the word ‘crypto’ as tokenized Treasuries and money funds become routine.”
If he’s right, the infrastructure being built now, without a statute to guide it, will matter well beyond this cycle.
- Eric Soufer, partner and head of advanced tech, Tusk Strategies
Ask an Expert
Q. Regulatory Vulnerability: How risky is it for institutions to pour capital into infrastructure built on temporary SEC exemptions and state-level workarounds?
The main risk is committing long-term capital to infrastructure that may only have temporary permission to operate. Exemptions can help institutions get started, but they need a credible plan if those permissions change or expire. I’d want clear ownership rights, segregated custody and a tested exit route that allows investors to recover their assets.
Q. Solving Fragmentation: How can institutions bridge siloed, private blockchains without compromising security or regulatory isolation?
Institutions need to connect networks without losing control over ownership, compliance or privacy. Bridges are improving but still carry real security and operational risks. While regulatory standards remain fragmented, I’d keep the legally recognized ownership record on the original chain and allow backed, redeemable representations to circulate elsewhere, with eligibility and transfer restrictions enforced on both networks.
Q. Actionable Advisor Takeaways: What criteria should financial advisors use to vet tokenized platforms when federal investor protections are still in limbo?
I would start with two questions: What does my client actually own, and how do they get their money back? Then check who holds the assets, who independently verifies the numbers and what happens if the platform fails. Look closely at fees, conflicts and withdrawal restrictions. If an advisor cannot clearly explain the ownership structure, the risks and the recovery process to a client, the due diligence is not finished.
- Diego Grassano, commercial director, Shyft; chief product officer, Lumia
Keep Reading
- The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has published its first proposed regulatory framework for crypto markets.
- AI agents are driving record transactions through Coinbase’s x402 protocol on Base, with U.S. wallets dominating AI model inference payments according to a Chainalysis report.
- A batch of 100 bitcoin mined for pennies in the Satoshi era, now worth $8.5 million, have moved for the first time in 16 years.
Looking for more? Receive the latest crypto news from coindesk.com and market updates from coindesk.com/institutions.
Diversified RWA stablecoins sustain 5-7% yield from real credit as crypto funding compresses to ~4%. GENIUS pushes yield off-chain; TAM grows to $4B in 3 years.